A move to amend the Indiana constitution to ban same-sex marriage is a bad idea.
Senate Joint Resolution 7 passed both houses of the Legislature two years ago, but to become law, the resolution has to pass again either this year or next, and then it must clear a statewide referendum.
The measure has already passed the Indiana Senate, and it is now headed to the House.
The amendment has two sections. The first says that marriage in Indiana is solely the union of one man and one woman, and the second says that state law cannot be construed to provide the benefits of marriage to unmarried couples or groups.
It’s that second provision that has proven the most controversial. Opponents say it is vague and could be used to invalidate domestic-violence laws as they relate to unmarried couples.
These critics point to Ohio, where a recent constitutional amendment has led some courts to rule that the state’s domestic-violence law no longer applies to unmarried partners because that state’s constitutional amendment gives their relationship no legal status.
Backers say Ohio’s amendment is worded differently and therefore the situations aren’t comparable, but opponents aren’t so sure.
Critics say the measure might also nullify a state law allowing single Hoosiers to adopt children, and they say it could wipe out contracts between unmarried people concerning inheritance, health care and other legal issues.
Proponents say the measure is needed to protect the sanctity of marriage from lawsuits and activist judges. We disagree.
Whatever threats might face the institution of marriage will not be affected by this amendment.
And just to be clear, this is not a debate about the legality of same-sex marriages. State law already prohibits such unions. This measure would simply write that prohibition into the state constitution, something we see as unnecessary and discriminatory.
The constitution should be reserved for spelling out individual rights, not restricting them.
Indiana does not need a marriage amendment. We call on the Indiana House to reject this measure.
Editorials
Marriage amendment
<b>State law already bans same-sex unions</b>
- Editorials
-
-
White should not return to office
The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state on charges of voter fraud has left Republicans and Democrats fighting over who will hold the office. No matter how the fight comes out, Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
A grand success for Indianapolis
The just-ended Super Bowl was the result of decades of preparation. Indianapolis left a great impression on the thousands of visitors who descended on the city.
-
Should schools teach creationism?
The Indiana General Assembly is considering a measure that would allow public schools to teach creationism as long as they include instruction on other reliigious theories. Broadening the instruction to include other religions might address constitutional concerns, but the result might be a class the law’s supporters didn’t envision.
-
Giving every child a chance
Students from Columbia Middle School delivered a message of inclusion in a play last weekend. The message is one that can’t be repeated too often.
-
Testing lawmakers a good idea
A measure requiring drug testing for welfare recipients would also require drug testing for legislators. If lawmakers are going to impose such a requirement on welfare recipients, they should be willing to stand up to the same measure.
-
Peru delivers important message
The city of Peru collected $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed. An aggressive enforcement effort can help the city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Jail GED program a great step
The issue
The Cass County Sheriff’s Department has begun offering GED
classes for its prisoners.
Our view
The department, and society at large, will see a huge return on that
investment. -
Ambulance services aren’t cheap
Cass County commissioners are looking at alternatives to the ambulance service provided by Logansport Memorial Hospital. Commissioners will be fortunate to find a less expensive alternative.
-
‘Right to work’ moves to next chapter
The Indiana House passed a proposed “right to work” measure this week after Democrats finally ended their boycott. The fight now moves to the ballot box, and labor unions will be working hard in the coming months to elect friendlier candidates.
-
Healthy debate on farm safety
Agriculture interests are up in arms about proposed rules aimed at ensuring the safety of young farm workers. Public feedback on the proposed regulations will almost certainly make them more effective.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
White should not return to office
Lower-hassle Screening to Be Tested at Airports
Raw Video: Dog Rescued From Icy Colo. Water
Helmet Camera Captures Calif. Fire Rescue
Worker Tells 911: Powell 'exploded the House'
Triple Win: Santorum Takes Minn., Mo., Colo.
Injured Marine Inspired by Homecoming
No Rape Charges Against Son of NYPD Commissioner
Egypt's Ruling Generals Play Risky Game With US
Former Komen Exec Defends Funding Cut
Skip the Coffee Cup and Inhale Your Caffeine Fix
Calif. Gay Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional
Jury Selection for Ex-UVa Athlete Enters 2nd Day
Cab Driver Helps Wis. Family Escape House Fire
Staff Removed at LA School During Abuse Probe
Runaway Goat Leads Police on Wild Chase
