—
I’m no different than most people. I hold life dear and cherish it. I’ve been listening to the comments on the definitions of what rape is by several Republicans. I see where Mike Pence cosponsored and voted for a bill that would redefine rape. The bill “would redefine rape so that women on Medicaid could only have abortion services covered if the rape was “forcible.” (My opinion: Rape is rape. Period!) It would also deny abortion coverage to victims of incest who are 18 years of age or older (OpenCongress, March 11, 2011). In 2008, he co-sponsored an invasive ultrasound bill. (He even voted against the Lilly Ledbetter law to provide equal pay for equal work.) He also recently came out in opposition to requiring health insurance coverage for birth control.
Then, Republican Todd Akin told KTVI-TV that pregnancy from rape is “really rare” and implied that the female reproductive system is able to block conception from an unwanted pregnancy (according to the Washington Post). “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down,” he said.
Now, there is Republican Richard Mourdock who said, in the debate, that if a woman gets pregnant from rape that “it is something that God intended to happen.” I’m a reasonable person who tries to be fair, but I have reached my limit with Republicans. Women, men, girls and boys, you cannot be deceived into believing that these ideas are not dangerous. They are widespread in the Republican Party and pose a real danger to all women and girls.
I understand the concern about abortion. But this radical thinking is way over the edge. Please, think about it before you vote. I worry for my daughters and granddaughters. I worry for your daughters and granddaughters.
Ken Taylor, Logansport
Opinion
PUBLIC FORUM: Republicans seek to redefine rape
- Opinion
-
-
THEIR VIEW: CEOs should buy their own perks
It’s no secret that CEOs of public companies make a lot of money.
-
WOLFSIE: Looking for my lost cell phone
For the longest time, I had a label on my cell phone displaying the mobile number so if I lost the device the person who found it could call me.
-
PUBLIC FORUM: Solar, wind power were considered
Ms. Madella Gellinger voiced some questions in her letter to the Pharos-Tribune April 21 about the new power plant. She asked why solar panels and wind turbines were not being considered
-
OUR VIEW: Scammers seek profit from tragedy
We’re disgusted we even have to write this editorial.
As residents of Oklahoma City and its suburbs barely start the process of picking themselves up off the ground, we’ve already received warnings from state police about scammers looking to make a quick buck off the misfortune of others. -
KITCHELL: New pope gives us hope for a better world
I’m not a member of the Roman Catholic faith, but if I were, I think I’d be proud of the new leader cardinals chose for my denomination.
-
OUR VIEW: Move over for workers, Ind. drivers
Most motorists already know that state law requires them to change lanes when approaching a stopped emergency or state highway vehicle when its emergency lights are flashing.
-
SOUTHERN: District boundaries show lack of respect
I can imagine no real reason why a county like Cass would be split up into three districts except to show it a lack of respect.
-
OUR VIEW: Are you prepared for a disaster?
As you read today’s final installment on disaster preparedness, which focuses on earthquakes and their very real threat right here in Indiana, we hope you take the message to heart and make the decision to prepare yourself. If you don’t, no one else will.
-
KNISELY: What are odds of that?
As you read this, I’ll be basking in the warm sun on a Florida beach. I’m not sure where you’ll be when reading this, but I’m pretty sure I’ll be coming out the winner. Seems only fair considering I was moving boxes in the rain just a few Sundays ago.
-
PUBLIC FORUM: Minimize our risk before making bet
A Logansport letter-writer calls a local proposal to generate energy from refuse-derived fuels a risky gamble.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
THEIR VIEW: CEOs should buy their own perks






